Restoring and protecting the
CRS
POSITION REGARDING
IN THE REGION’S TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PLAN
August 21, 2007
The Cahaba River Society (CRS) submitted the following
comments to the Metropolitan Planning Organization and ALDOT concerning
proposed funding for the
CRS believes it is premature to fast-track those sections of the Northern Beltline east of I-65 and include them in the TIP for right of way acquisition and other projects within the next four years, because the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) has not completed essential work with the community to ensure that these segments of the project will conserve our water resources and are in the entire region’s best interest. We asked that these segments be removed from the TIP to give time for adequate and meaningful environmental review, incorporation of highway design to conserve water resources, and full evaluation of the best way to invest limited resources to promote growth that will equitably benefit the region. However, the TIP was approved by the MPO with the beltline funding included.
CRS has offered our assistance to ALDOT over the past several years to determine the best way to invest in transportation improvements for regional growth that will also conserve our water resources and drinking water supply, and we stand ready to continue that conversation with all parties.
CRS recognizes that the communities of our watershed and the larger metro area desire the benefits of growth. CRS supports economic growth in the region that is environmentally sound, equitable, and cost efficient. For the past several years we have therefore tried to work with ALDOT with an aim to influence the Northern Beltline design and environmental review process, to ensure that the information is available that is needed to make wise decisions and to enhance the conservation of our watersheds to benefit the region as a whole.
For instance, we have met with ALDOT officials several times to recommend ways to design and manage the project that would greatly reduce the construction impacts and long term impacts of the interstate that would otherwise harm water quality and negatively impact our drinking water supply. We have also successfully urged ALDOT to undertake an updated and more thorough environmental review of the project as required by federal law.
However, ALDOT has not completed these essential environmental studies and has not addressed the need to incorporate low impact development design in the beltline, which, if taken seriously, have the potential to alter the right of way required for the project.
In addition,
there is substantial public opposition in the communities of the
Environmental Review Must Be Completed
If funding for the Beltline stays in
the TIP, the proposed projects are inappropriately focused on fast-tracking
the segments of the Northern Beltline in the most environmentally-sensitive
areas of the planned route: the upper
Note that the
Environmental Protection Agency stated during the initial environmental
review process that the route chosen in these segments was the most
environmentally-damaging of the potential routes. The initial environmental
review documents are outdated and did not consider essential factors, such
as impact to our drinking water source, or the cumulative or indirect
(development-inducing) impacts of the Beltline. In addition, the
Thus it is
critically important to take the time to complete full environmental
studies, which should provide new information, and allow public review and
involvement in those studies, to determine the best way to proceed and also
conserve the
Improved Design of Beltline and Associated Development Essential to Protect Water Resources
CRS and others
have provided the project design team and ALDOT officials many proposals for
improving the construction best management practices and design of the
roadway to reduce the potential short term and long term negative impacts to
water quality and water supply. Thus far the agency’s proposed design for
the first
Proper implementation of adequate construction and post-construction controls could affect the precise location and the width of the construction zone, and thus the right of way, of the beltline. Right of way purchase should not proceed until ALDOT adequately addresses these design issues that are crucial to the future health of our water resources.
The communities planning to grow around the Beltline also need to incorporate these same low impact design innovations and improved storm water control into their local planning, zoning and development review in order to maintain the river systems that we rely on for drinking water, recreation, and other uses. CRS promotes feasible, affordable methods to design growth to conserve our water resources.
CRS stands ready to work with ALDOT and with communities along the Beltline route to design the highway and associated development in ways to avoid damage to our water resources. More information about potential ways to accomplish this is outlined in the SELC comment letter.
Economic Questions Concerning Wider Regional Benefit
Crucial questions
also need to answered about the best uses of limited funds for the region’s
transportation needs and for economic growth that would equitably benefit
the region as a whole. We ask the MPO and ALDOT to take
a more holistic look at transportation alternatives, such as improved
regional transit, that will support the revitalization of existing developed
areas to meet more of our region’s growth needs. This could provide more
cost-effective long-term benefits to the entire
Conclusion
CRS continues to be willing to work with all involved to determine the best way to invest in growth that protects our water resources and drinking water supply, so that when all costs and gains are taken into account the project will benefit the entire region. We asked that the segments of the beltline east of I-65 be removed from the TIP to allow the public and private sectors to work together to fully address these vital regional concerns. We ask the MPO to take the time to do this, as we will all live with the consequences far into the future.