
ALDOT HIGHWAY 98 PROJECT POLLUTES
MOBILE DRINKING WATER SOURCE -
PROVING THAT WATER QUALITY CONCERNS ABOUT
For the past 2 months, the Mobile Register has broken numerous stories
about serious water quality damage caused by the Alabama Department of
Transportation's 4-lane
These problems
underscore the
What can you do?
Talk with local officials, business leaders, and civic leaders in your
community and ask that they press ALDOT to stop buying
MORE:
The Highway
98 project has loosed a flood of mud into area streams and the reservoir -
despite a prior legal settlement in which ALDOT committed to construct
the project in a way that safeguarded
Reasons cited by the Register and admitted by ALDOT include poor design by ALDOT, inadequate right of way, poor construction management, a lack of basic sediment controls, and weak oversight by ADEM. In response ALDOT has delayed 23 road construction projects around the state to review its environmental practices.
The Register reported on November 13 that the Mobile Area Water and Sewer Service (MAWSS) plans to file suit against ALDOT, seeking an injunction that would stop all construction work on the U.S. 98 project, because the water agency has lost faith in ALDOT’s ability to build a road that will not continue to pollute Mobile’s water source for decades to come.
Just days after Joe McInnes, ALDOT’s director, delivered an apology to the people of Mobile via the Register, saying ... "I'm here to fall on my sword, to grovel, to apologize profusely," the contractor was still operating along streams without sediment controls in place and more mud was seen flowing into the region’s previously pristine Escatawpa River.
MAWSS also plans to pursue
legal action against ALDOT's road building contractor, W. S. Newell & Sons,
Inc., for neglecting environmental protections at the site. CRS has heard
that this same company is under consideration by ALDOT to construct the
According to the Register, the damage from poor road construction practices
include: a plume of sediment into Big Creek Lake that may require extra
drinking water treatment and could reduce the lake's capacity and add to
drinking water costs; red mud from construction up to 2 feet deep
damaging nearby streams and wetlands and 2 to 3 inches of mud into parts of
the Escatawpa River, one of the nation’s pristine sandy streams.
ALDOT officials admit that the road was not adequately designed for water quality protection, which led to inadequate right-of-way being purchased and not enough room for features to minimize and contain mud.
This
underscores a chief concern of the Cahaba River Society regarding the
ALDOT should
halt right of way acquisition on this stretch of the Beltline pending
incorporation of effective water quality protection measures in the roadway
design, to avoid a repeat of the
Since the
Mobile Register broke the story on September 19th, the Department of
Transportation has spent $2.2 million attempting to bring the Highway 98
project into compliance and added one mile of additional silt fencing. Yet
continued mud runoff has prompted the water agency to seek an injunction.
ALDOT also claimed that ADEM had inspected the U.S. 98 project 16 times and
had not found any problems of concern.
HIGHWAY 98 POLLUTION STORY LINKS ON al.com:
Below is a
series of links/stories describing this environmental mess in
MOBILE REGISTER'S SERIES OF STORIES SINCE SEPTEMBER
http://blog.al.com/pr/2007/09/muddy_98.html
Story summary, links to past and current articles and photographs
Most recent:
LAWSUIT
WILL ASK FOR INJUNCTION TO STOP
http://www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/1194949135192480.xml&coll=3
Director of the
RUNOFF CONTINUES AFTER
APOLOGY FROM STATE HIGHWAY OFFICIALS, WHO SAY NEW PROJECT MANAGER HAS BEEN
FIRED
http://www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/119451737020600.xml&coll=3
Just days after ALDOT
apology to the people of
REGISTER'S EDITORIAL
http://www.al.com/opinion/press-register/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1194171520227800.xml&coll=3
Quotes ALDOT Director Joe McInnes about what went wrong: ALDOT didn't buy enough highway right of way for the contractor to implement erosion control measures correctly; the local ALDOT office did not oversee the job properly; ADEM did not raise any alarms, so ALDOT assumed the project’s mud controls were adequate (despite its own inspections). ALDOT officials recognize that the department's credibility is damaged “and that the public may be suspicious about future promises that major highway construction projects can take place without major environmental damage.”
http://www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/1193994981231370.xml&coll=3
WITH
http://www.al.com/press-register/stories/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1192699735303400.xml&coll=3
Repeats and dismisses
agency excuses. ADEM inspections had not revealed a problem, and an ADEM
official said that it is hard to keep up with such a big project. In reply
to ALDOT’s excuse that it is difficult to build a highway in tough terrain
while protecting wetlands and wildlife habitat, the Register noted that
ALDOT “recommended the route over several others, and pledged that it could
handle the construction without damaging the environment or
(CRS note: ALDOT also
chose the
Mobile Baykeeper's Website (This organization sued the Dept. of Transportation 2 years ago trying to prevent problems such as the one's described above)